Skip to content
Search the site

Anxiety and mental health

OCD, Hair Pulling and CBD Oil: What Does the Research Say?

Prepared by: cbd.school editorial teamLast updated: 12 studies reviewed

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) shows up as unwanted thoughts that come into the mind again and again (obsessions) and as behaviors a person feels they must carry out to ease the distress those thoughts cause (compulsions). Hair-pulling disorder (trichotillomania) and skin-picking disorder are conditions considered related to OCD, in which a person pulls out their hair or picks at their skin and finds it hard to stop. Many people living with these conditions wonder whether CBD oil or cannabis might bring some relief. On this page you will find the research done so far, what is known about cannabis use, and what to keep in mind when using it alongside OCD medicines.

What does the research say?

Researchers' interest in this topic comes largely from animal studies: in animals, substances that strengthen the body's own cannabinoid system (the endocannabinoid system) reduced compulsion-like behaviors, and substances that weaken it increased them. It has also been reported that some genes of this system are less active in the blood of people with OCD. These findings explain the search for new treatments, but they do not show a treatment effect in humans.

In OCD, the only study that compared cannabinoids with an inactive substance (placebo) and assigned participants to groups at random is a laboratory study. In the US, 12 adults with OCD who had used cannabis before smoked cannabis once on each of three separate days: THC-dominant, CBD-dominant (also containing a small amount of THC) or cannabis with no active ingredient; neither the participants nor the people assessing them knew who smoked what on which day. Obsessions and compulsions decreased over time on all three days, but there was no difference by type of cannabis. Momentary anxiety, on the other hand, decreased more after the inactive cannabis than after the THC-dominant or CBD-dominant cannabis. According to the researchers, this result shows how important placebo-controlled studies are for understanding the effect of cannabis. The study used a single dose; it does not show the effect of long-term use.

The same team also tested nabilone, a synthetic THC-like medicine, together with exposure and response prevention therapy, one of the most effective treatments for OCD. In all, 11 adults with OCD took nabilone for 4 weeks; 5 of them, chosen at random, also received therapy during the same period. OCD severity (the 0–40-point Yale-Brown scale, Y-BOCS) fell by an average of 2.5 points in those taking nabilone alone and by 11.2 points in those receiving therapy along with nabilone. However, this study had no group taking a dummy treatment or receiving therapy alone; so it is not known how much of the improvement came from the therapy and how much from nabilone. The first 3 participants left the study because of increased anxiety lasting 12–24 hours after the first dose; later participants were started on a lower dose.

In hair-pulling disorder, dronabinol, a synthetic form of THC, was first tried in a small study without a comparison group: in 14 women who pulled their hair, the hair-pulling score fell by about half over 12 weeks, and 9 people responded to treatment. The same team later tested it in 50 adults split at random into two groups; 34 of the participants pulled their hair and 16 picked their skin. At the end of 10 weeks, symptoms had clearly decreased in both groups, but dronabinol was not better than the dummy treatment on any measure: the treatment response was 67% with dronabinol and 50% with placebo, and this difference was not statistically significant. Of the 50 people, 20 (11 in the dronabinol group, 9 in the placebo group) did not complete the study; a study this small can miss a small difference. In other words, much of the improvement in the first study may have come from expectation and from change over time. A 2021 Cochrane review of medicine treatments for hair pulling also found no firm evidence for any medicine; there were no cannabinoid studies among the studies it reviewed.

The only trial of pure CBD in OCD and related disorders was carried out in the US with the approved (licensed) CBD medicine. This small study, open to adults diagnosed with OCD, hoarding, hair pulling or skin picking, or Tourette syndrome, was started by 4 people, and 2 of them completed it. The results were added to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry record in summer 2026; there is no peer-reviewed publication. In the 2 people who completed it, the average change in the OCD severity score was 2 points (0–40 scale; the registry record does not clearly state the direction of the change), and overall illness severity did not change; no one was assessed with the hair-pulling or skin-picking scale. No conclusion can be drawn from a study without a comparison group and with so few people.

In children, the only data come from pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS), a condition in which obsessions and compulsions start suddenly after infections. In Australia, 14 children took a cannabis extract containing mainly the acid form of CBD (CBDA, cannabidiolic acid) and a small amount of THC for 12 weeks; all of the children had OCD symptoms. Overall illness severity and a children's OCD scale improved clearly. However, there was no comparison group, the children kept taking their other medicines, PANS can get better and worse on its own, and the study was funded by the companies developing the product. The researchers write that a placebo-controlled study is being prepared.

A large 2026 review bringing together cannabinoid studies in mental health conditions did not find enough studies for a pooled analysis in OCD. A 2026 scoping review looking specifically at cannabinoids in OCD also wrote that most of the evidence comes from surveys and individual patient reports, that there are no well-controlled studies, and that the current evidence does not support using synthetic or natural cannabinoids to treat OCD. In THC studies with Tourette syndrome patients, obsessive-compulsive symptoms were examined only as an additional measure, and the results are mixed: in a placebo-controlled study in which 12 adults received a single dose of THC, these symptoms decreased more than with placebo on a symptom checklist filled in by the patients, but worsening was seen on another scale used in the same study; a study with 22 adults reported that these symptoms might decrease with an oil containing THC and CBD; in an uncontrolled study with THC-containing medical cannabis, obsessions worsened in one patient. The Cochrane review of cannabinoids in Tourette syndrome (2009) did not find enough evidence to support their use for tics and obsessive-compulsive behaviors. Details are on the site's Tourette Syndrome page.

Surveys show that many people with OCD who use cannabis report positive effects, but also that it carries significant risks. In a US survey answered by 601 adults with OCD who use cannabis, 29% of participants used cannabis specifically for OCD symptoms, and most said cannabis reduced their obsessions and compulsions; on the other hand, about 17% reported worsening obsessions, 42% met the criteria for cannabis use disorder (addiction), and the more cannabis people used, the less likely they were to receive proven OCD treatment. In data that 87 people who described themselves as having OCD logged in a phone app, users reported a clear drop in compulsions right after smoking cannabis; the reported drop was larger with products high in CBD. However, the diagnoses were not confirmed, there was no placebo group, and the effect on obsessions faded over time; because this study relied only on users' own records, it was not included in the table. At an OCD clinic in Italy, 43% of 70 patients had used cannabis at some point in their lives; about 10% of those who had used it reported improvement in OCD symptoms and 23% reported worsening anxiety. These findings rely on people's own reports and do not match the result of the placebo-controlled laboratory study.

In an online survey of people with hair-pulling or skin-picking disorder, about a third of participants had used cannabis in the past year; those who used it pulled their hair or picked their skin on more days per week. In a US study that followed 547 young people from age 17 to age 19, cannabis use at 17 was linked to slightly more obsessive-compulsive symptoms at 19. Individual patient reports have described both improvement with THC and obsessions that began with cannabis use. These are observational findings; they do not show cause and effect, but they suggest that cannabis does not always ease these symptoms.

Strength of evidence: ○○○○ Insufficient evidence. Finding: Not studied enough. What does this mean?

Ongoing research on this topic

No ongoing CBD trial on this topic appears on ClinicalTrials.gov right now. All ongoing trials

Possible side effects and drug interactions

In the controlled study in hair pulling and skin picking, mild or moderate side effects occurred in 16 of 25 people taking dronabinol and in 7 of 25 taking placebo; the most common were dizziness, sleepiness, a 'high' feeling, dulled attention and thinking, and dry mouth; there were no serious side effects. In people with OCD, smoked THC-containing cannabis raised heart rate and blood pressure; one participant who also had panic disorder had temporary panic symptoms. After the first dose of nabilone, 3 people stopped because of increased anxiety; once the dose was started lower, no one stopped. In the 4-person study with the approved CBD medicine, 1 person had diarrhea. With the CBDA-dominant extract used in children, a third of the children had nausea, diarrhea, tiredness or a delay in falling asleep.

Many people with OCD take antidepressants. CBD can slow the breakdown of some medicines in the body: in healthy volunteers, CBD increased the total amount of citalopram in the blood by 43%; low sodium and difficulty thinking were reported in a patient using CBD with sertraline. No human studies were found that looked at CBD together with fluvoxamine or clomipramine, which are commonly used in OCD. Details are below and on the site's Antidepressants page.

To check interactions with the medicines you take: CBD drug interaction checker.

How was CBD used in studies?

In the controlled study in hair pulling and skin picking, dronabinol (synthetic THC) was started at 5 mg a day, increased every two weeks up to 15 mg a day, and used for 10 weeks; in the uncontrolled study in hair pulling, 2.5–15 mg a day was used (average effective dose about 11.6 mg a day). In the nabilone study in OCD, 1 mg was given twice a day (2 mg a day) for 4 weeks; after some people dropped out, it was started at 0.25–0.5 mg twice a day and increased over about 1.5 weeks. In the laboratory study, participants smoked half of a cannabis cigarette in a single session (study doses; not a personal recommendation).

In the only study with pure CBD, the approved CBD medicine was given at 5 mg per kilogram of body weight a day in the first week, then 10 mg a day (milligrams per kilogram per day; for a person weighing 60 kg, that is 300 and 600 mg a day, respectively). In children with PANS, the CBDA-dominant extract was started at 5 mg per kilogram a day and increased to 20 mg over 4 weeks (study doses; not a personal recommendation). At none of these doses has a benefit for OCD or hair pulling been shown in a controlled study.

Study details (for health professionals)

In hair-pulling and skin-picking disorder, in the only placebo-controlled RCT (Grant 2022; 50 adults, 10 weeks, dronabinol 5–15 mg/day), dronabinol did not separate from placebo on any efficacy measure; symptoms decreased in both groups, and response at week 10 was 67% vs. 50% (p = 0.459); 20 of the 50 people did not complete it (11 vs. 9); in the same team's earlier open-label study (Grant 2011; 14 women, 12 weeks), the MGH-HPS had fallen from 16.5 to 8.7 (p = 0.001). In OCD, the only placebo-controlled study is a crossover, single-dose laboratory study (Kayser 2020; 12 analyzed): smoked THC-dominant (7% THC) and CBD-dominant (10.4% CBD, 0.4% THC) cannabis did not affect obsessive-compulsive symptoms differently from placebo (condition p = 0.72), reduced momentary anxiety less than placebo (p = 0.002), and THC increased heart rate and blood pressure. In a randomized but placebo-free pilot (Kayser 2020, nabilone; 11 completers, 4 weeks, 2 mg/day), the Y-BOCS fell by 2.5 points with nabilone alone and by 11.2 points with nabilone plus exposure and response prevention therapy (p = 0.005); nabilone's contribution cannot be separated out, and 3 people stopped after the first dose because of increased anxiety. The only data with pure CBD come from an open-label study with the approved CBD medicine whose results are only in the registry record (NCT04978428): 4 people started and 2 completed it; the mean change was 2 on the Y-BOCS (SD 4.24) and 0 on the CGI-S. In 14 children with PANS, in an uncontrolled, manufacturer-funded study with a CBDA-dominant, low-THC extract (NTI164, 20 mg/kg/day, 12 weeks), the CY-BOCS-II (p = 0.0001) and CGI-S (from 4.8 to 3.3) improved (Keating 2026). A 2026 meta-analysis of cannabinoid RCTs in mental health conditions found no data to run a meta-analysis for OCD (Wilson 2026); a 2026 scoping review specific to OCD wrote that most of the evidence consists of surveys and case reports and does not support cannabinoid use (Van Ameringen 2026). Among 601 people with OCD who use cannabis, 29.1% used cannabis for OCD, 42.1% had cannabis use disorder, and the more they used, the less likely they were to receive treatment (Kayser 2021); at an OCD clinic, 42.8% of patients had used cannabis at some point in their lives, and about 10% of those who had used it reported improvement and 23.3% worsening anxiety (Benatti 2023); in hair-pulling and skin-picking disorder, about 33% had used cannabis in the past year, and use was linked to more pulling and picking days (Collins 2025); in adolescents, cannabis use at 17 was linked to slightly more obsessive-compulsive symptoms at 19 (β = 0.13; Kutzner 2023). October 2026 search (PubMed, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, Europe PMC): 3 randomized studies with cannabinoids on this topic were found (two placebo-controlled: 10 weeks of dronabinol in hair pulling and skin picking, and single-dose smoked cannabis in OCD; the third a nabilone pilot without placebo), plus 3 uncontrolled studies (one with pure CBD, results only in the registry record), 2 reviews and 4 observational studies looking at cannabis use; all are in the table below. There is no Cochrane review of cannabinoids in OCD or hair pulling (the 2009 Cochrane review of cannabinoids in Tourette syndrome, based on two small THC studies, found no evidence to support their use for tics and obsessive-compulsive behaviors); the 2021 Cochrane review of medicine treatments for hair pulling includes no cannabinoid studies. As of October 2026, no cannabinoid study recruiting patients was found on ClinicalTrials.gov; a planned brain imaging study with nabilone was withdrawn before any patients were enrolled.

Evidence assessment: Pure CBD: Insufficient (no placebo-controlled studies of pure CBD in OCD and related disorders; in the only uncontrolled study with the approved CBD medicine, 4 people started and 2 completed it, with results only in the registry record; CBD-dominant smoked cannabis was tested only as a single dose, in a 12-person laboratory study)

CBD alone

There are no placebo-controlled studies of pure CBD or CBD oil in OCD or in hair pulling or skin picking. The only data come from a short study without a comparison group, done in the US with the approved CBD medicine (oral solution): 4 people started and 2 completed it; in those who completed it, the average change on the OCD severity scale (0–40) was 2 points (the direction is not clear in the registry record), and overall illness severity did not change; the results are only in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, with no peer-reviewed publication. In the 12-person laboratory study in OCD, CBD-dominant cannabis smoked once (10.4% CBD, 0.4% THC) did not affect obsessions and compulsions differently from placebo and reduced anxiety less than placebo did; because this product contained some THC, however little, it was not counted as pure CBD.

Products containing THC

There are two placebo-controlled studies with THC-containing products; neither showed a difference from placebo in obsessive-compulsive or pulling and picking symptoms. In 50 adults who pulled their hair or picked their skin, dronabinol at 5–15 mg a day for 10 weeks was not better than placebo on any measure (response 67% vs. 50%; p = 0.459; 20 of the 50 people did not complete the study). In 12 adults with OCD, THC-dominant (7% THC) or CBD-dominant cannabis smoked once did not affect obsessions and compulsions differently from placebo, reduced momentary anxiety less than placebo did, and THC raised heart rate and blood pressure. In a pilot study without placebo using nabilone, a synthetic THC-like medicine, the Y-BOCS score of 11 adults with OCD fell by an average of 2.5 points in those taking nabilone alone and by 11.2 points in those who also received exposure therapy alongside nabilone; because there was no placebo or therapy-only group, it is not known how much of the improvement came from nabilone. An uncontrolled study in 14 women who pulled their hair reported improvement with dronabinol, but the later controlled study did not confirm this. In an uncontrolled study in 14 children with PANS, OCD symptoms improved with a low-THC, CBDA-dominant extract (manufacturer-funded). A 2026 meta-analysis combining cannabinoid trials in mental health conditions found insufficient data for OCD; a 2026 scoping review specific to OCD wrote that the evidence does not support cannabinoid use. Of people with OCD who use cannabis, 42% met the criteria for use disorder (survey).

Evidence: THC and THC-like compounds: Very weak (a single 50-person controlled study in hair pulling and skin picking, no difference from placebo, 20 people did not complete it; in OCD, only a 12-person single-dose laboratory study, no difference; a small pilot without placebo using nabilone and two small uncontrolled studies; in children, only a single uncontrolled study)

Dose range in studies

Dronabinol (synthetic THC) 5–15 mg/day, 10 weeks (hair pulling and skin picking, controlled) and 2.5–15 mg/day, 12 weeks (hair pulling, uncontrolled); nabilone 2 mg/day, 4 weeks (OCD, no placebo); smoked cannabis, single dose (OCD, laboratory); approved CBD medicine 5 mg/kg/day for 1 week, then 10 mg/kg/day (OCD and related disorders, 4 people, uncontrolled); in children, CBDA-dominant extract 20 mg/kg/day (PANS, uncontrolled)

Starting dose and titration

Dronabinol was increased by 5 mg every two weeks (Grant 2022); with nabilone, after dropouts because of anxiety following the first dose, it was started at 0.25–0.5 mg twice a day and raised to 1 mg twice a day over 1.5 weeks (Kayser 2020, nabilone); the approved CBD was doubled after one week (NCT04978428); the CBDA-dominant extract was increased by 5 mg/kg each week and reached the target dose in 4 weeks (Keating 2026)

These are doses researchers gave under medical supervision; they are not a recommended dose for you. "mg/kg/day" means milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day.

OCD and Hair Pulling and CBD: studies reviewed
StudyParticipantsProductDose and titrationDurationResultSource
Grant 2022
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group RCT (single center, University of Chicago; according to the registry record, participants, investigators and raters were blinded)
50 randomized (25 dronabinol / 25 placebo; 34 hair pulling, 16 skin picking); 30 completed (14 / 16)
Adults with hair-pulling disorder (trichotillomania) or skin-picking disorder (US; mean age 30.7; 40 of 50 were women; people taking other psychiatric medicines were not included; according to the registry record, 22 of the 50 had another psychiatric diagnosis)
Dronabinol (synthetic THC), by mouth; placebo5–15 mg a day (according to the registry record, 5 mg for the first 2 weeks, 10 mg for the next 2 weeks and 15 mg/day for the last 6 weeks)
Increase of 5 mg every two weeks, if the investigator considered it necessary (registry record)
10 weeksOn the primary measure (the clinician-rated NIMH hair-pulling or skin-picking severity scale), dronabinol did not separate from placebo on any efficacy measure; symptoms decreased clearly in both groups. At week 10, response ("much" or "very much" improved on global impression) was 67% with dronabinol and 50% with placebo (p = 0.459). Group means and confidence intervals are not in the abstract, and the full text could not be read; the registry record has only baseline scores
Side effects: According to the registry record, no serious side effects; non-serious side effects in 16/25 people with dronabinol and 7/25 with placebo. With dronabinol, lightheadedness or dizziness in 5 (placebo 1), sleepiness in 5 (3), a "high" feeling in 4 (0), dulled attention and thinking in 4 (2), dry mouth in 4 (2), anxiety in 2 (1) people
PMID 34825898, doi:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000382, NCT03530800, October 2018–November 2021, results entered in the registry record on June 2, 2022: participant flow, baseline characteristics and side effect table). The full text is not open access, funding and the declaration of interests could not be read
Kayser 2020 (laboratory)
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover (within-subject) laboratory study; three sessions, a single dose in each (New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University)
14 randomized; 12 completed all three sessions and were analyzed (2 left after the first session because of the time burden)
Adults diagnosed with OCD who had used cannabis before without problems (aged 21–55; mean 26.8; 8 of 12 were men; baseline Y-BOCS mean 20.1; 2 were taking an SSRI; people with cannabis use disorder or a personal or first-degree relative's history of psychosis or bipolar disorder were not included)
Smoked cannabis cigarette (from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse, about 800 mg of plant material per cigarette): THC-dominant (7.0% THC, 0.18% CBD), CBD-dominant (0.4% THC, 10.4% CBD) or placebo (0% THC, 0% CBD)Half a cigarette in each session, using a paced smoking procedure (5-second puff, 10-second hold, 40-second interval); the amount taken in was not measured in mg
None (single dose)
Single dose, three separate sessions (3 hours of monitoring in each session; on average 12.5 days between sessions)Obsessive and compulsive symptoms (a self-rated adaptation of the Y-BOCS, YBOCCS; visual analog scale) decreased over time in all three conditions, but there was no difference by type of cannabis (YBOCCS condition p = 0.72; condition × time p = 0.577). Momentary anxiety (STAI-S) decreased more with placebo than with either active cannabis (condition p = 0.002; mean difference −4.31 points vs. THC and −3.85 points vs. CBD-dominant); the difference was clear at 20 minutes and, compared with THC, still present at 40 minutes. THC increased the "high" feeling, heart rate and systolic blood pressure compared with placebo and CBD-dominant cannabis. Because both active cannabis types contained THC (0.4% in the CBD-dominant cannabis), the row was counted as a THC-containing product. Supported by an NIMH training grant and a donation; the authors reported no conflicts of interest
Side effects: No serious side effects; the most common were tension and dry mouth. In one participant who also had panic disorder and used cannabis every day, panic symptoms about 20 minutes after THC (passed within 40 minutes)
PMID 32383271, doi:10.1002/da.23032, NCT03274440, results in the registry record). PMC7423713
Kayser 2020 (nabilone and exposure therapy)
Randomized, open-label pilot study; no placebo group (both groups took nabilone, one also received therapy); independent raters were blind to the study design. Published in the journal as a letter to the editor
15 randomized; 3 stopped after the first dose because of increased anxiety, 1 was withdrawn; 11 completed (6 nabilone alone / 5 nabilone + therapy). 16 people in the registry record
Adults (aged 18–60) with at least moderate OCD who were not taking psychiatric medicines (baseline Y-BOCS mean 26; most had little or no exposure to cannabis; people with a history of bipolar disorder or psychosis were not included)
Nabilone (synthetic THC-like cannabinoid), oral capsule; in one group, also exposure and response prevention therapy (9 sessions over 4 weeks, 90 minutes)1 mg twice a day (2 mg/day), 28 days
Changed after the first 3 dropouts: started at 0.25–0.5 mg twice a day and raised to 1 mg twice a day over the first 1.5 weeks
4 weeks (+1 month of follow-up)Over 4 weeks, the Y-BOCS (0–40) fell on average by 2.5 (SD 3.6) points with nabilone alone and by 11.2 (SD 3.4) points with nabilone + therapy; the difference adjusted for baseline score was significant (p = 0.005). The drop was maintained 1 month later (Y-BOCS 24.2 vs. 15.8). No change on depression and anxiety-stress measures. Because there was no placebo or therapy-only group, nabilone's contribution to therapy cannot be separated out; in 21 non-randomized people who received 17 therapy sessions over 8 weeks from the same therapists during the same period, the 4-week drop was 6.1 points (no statistical comparison was made). The authors consider the result preliminary. Supported by an NIMH training grant and a donation; the authors reported no conflicts of interest
Side effects: No serious side effects. In week 1, the most common were dry mouth (9 people), tension (8), sleepiness (7), and difficulty concentrating, disorientation and forgetfulness (4 each); by week 4, most were mild. 3 people stopped after the first dose because of increased anxiety lasting 12–24 hours; no participant reported euphoria
PMID 32068563, doi:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001179, NCT02911324, results in the registry record, Y-BOCS change the same as in the article). PMC7206660
NCT04978428 (approved CBD, OCD and related disorders; registry results)
Phase 2, open-label, single-group pilot study (University of Chicago). Results only on ClinicalTrials.gov; no peer-reviewed publication
4 started; 2 completed and were analyzed
Adults (aged 18–65) with a primary diagnosis of OCD, hoarding disorder, skin picking, hair pulling or Tourette syndrome, a Y-BOCS score of at least 18, and not taking other psychiatric medicines (the 4 participants had a mean age of 26; 3 were women); the participants' diagnoses are not in the registry record
Approved CBD medicine (Epidiolex), oral solution2.5 mg/kg twice a day (5 mg/kg/day) for 1 week, then 5 mg/kg twice a day (10 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks
The dose was doubled after one week
In the registry record, the study duration and primary measurement are 2 weeks; the dose schedule, however, describes 1 + 2 weeksIn the 2 people who completed it, the mean change in the Y-BOCS total score (0–40) from baseline to week 2 was 2 (SD 4.24); the registry record does not clearly state the direction of the change. No one was analyzed for the hair-pulling or skin-picking scale (NIMH). The change in overall illness severity (CGI-S) was 0 (SD 1.41); functioning (Sheehan) 0, depression (HAM-D) 1.5, anxiety (HAM-A) 0.5, quality of life −3.5. No comparison group and very few participants; no conclusion can be drawn
Side effects: No serious side effects; diarrhea in 1 of 4 people
NCT04978428, results entered in the registry record on July 29, 2026), no peer-reviewed publication found in PubMed (October 30, 2026)
Grant 2011
Prospective, open-label, single-group pilot study (US)
14; 12 completed (in the registry record, all 14 appear to have completed)
Women with hair-pulling disorder (DSM-IV; mean age 33.3)
Dronabinol (synthetic THC), by mouth2.5–15 mg a day; mean effective dose 11.6 (SD 4.1) mg/day
Not reported (in the abstract; the full text could not be read)
12 weeksThe Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS, 0–28) fell on average from 16.5 to 8.7 (p = 0.001); 9 of 14 people (64.3%) responded (at least a 35% reduction and marked improvement in global impression). No clear impairment on computerized cognitive tests. No placebo group; in the same team's later placebo-controlled study (Grant 2022), dronabinol was no different from placebo
Side effects: According to the registry record, no serious side effects; lightheadedness or dizziness in 4 of 14 people
PMID 21590520, doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2347-8, NCT01093976, only 14 women with hair pulling alone were enrolled, final MGH-HPS score 8.71, SD 5.48). NIH support
Keating 2026 (NTI164, PANS)
Phase 1/2, open-label, single-group study (Australia, two children's hospitals); funded by the product companies (registry sponsor Fenix Innovation Group, collaborator Neurotech International); 2 of the 15 authors reported company ties: the last author received financial support from both companies, and the first author started working at the sponsor company after the study ended (the other 13 authors reported no conflicts of interest); according to the article, the sponsors had no role in data collection or analysis
14 children (article); 18 people in the registry record
Children aged 4–17 diagnosed with pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) with recurrent flare-ups (mean age 12.1; 10 boys); all 14 had OCD symptoms; baseline CY-BOCS mean 33.1 (severe); 9 were taking an SSRI, 9 an antipsychotic and 7 a stimulant medicine
Full-spectrum cannabis extract (NTI164), by mouth: mainly CBDA, plus CBD, CBGA, CBDV and a little THC (below 0.3% in the article, 0.08% in the registry record)Target 20 mg/kg/day, in 2 doses a day (reduced to 15 mg/kg/day in one child because of diarrhea and to 17.5 mg/kg/day in one because of tiredness)
Started at 5 mg/kg/day and increased by 5 mg/kg per week; target dose at week 4; in those who stopped, reduced by 5 mg/kg per week
12 weeks (4 weeks of dose titration + 8 weeks of treatment)At 12 weeks, overall illness severity (CGI-S) fell from 4.8 to 3.3 (p = 0.002); improvement on the children's OCD scale (CY-BOCS-II) (p = 0.0001; the week-12 score is in a supplementary table and could not be read); improvement also in the primary outcome, emotional regulation (parent-rated RCADS-P; p < 0.0001), and in tics, ADHD symptoms and quality of life. No placebo group; other medicines and psychological support continued; PANS follows a course of flare-ups that get better and worse on their own. The authors write that a placebo-controlled study is being prepared. CBDA is not CBD; because the product contains measurable THC, it was counted as a THC-containing product
Side effects: Product-related side effects in 33% of children: nausea, diarrhea, tiredness, delay in falling asleep; 1 serious side effect (diarrhea; the family continued the product). No significant changes in blood counts or liver and kidney tests at 12 weeks
PMID 41513541, doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00828, NCT06621888, 18 people in the registry record, June 2023–December 2025, no results entered). PMC12976522. The autism study of the same product is in the site's autism table (Keating 2026, NTI164, Harmony)
Wilson 2026
Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs (1980–May 13, 2025; PROSPERO CRD42023392718; GRADE)
54 RCTs, 2,477 participants (all mental health conditions and substance use disorders); not enough studies in OCD for a meta-analysis
People with a mental health condition or substance use disorder (including OCD)
Cannabinoids (CBD, THC, combinations of the two and other cannabinoids)There were not enough data to run a meta-analysis for OCD (abstract; also for ADHD, bipolar disorder and tobacco use disorder). Across all diagnoses, the certainty of the evidence is low for most outcomes; 44% of the studies have a high risk of bias. According to the authors, routine use of cannabinoids in mental health conditions can rarely be justified for now
Side effects: The chance of any side effect was higher with cannabinoids (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.25–2.46; number needed to harm 7); no difference in serious side effects or study withdrawal
PMID 41856154, doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(26)00015-5, Correction: Lancet Psychiatry 2026, PMID 42302809, June 16, 2026: the axis of a figure and the study counts in the table were corrected, results unchanged). The same review is also in the site's anxiety, psychosis, depression, bipolar, sleep, substance use, autism, Tourette syndrome, appetite loss and ADHD tables
Van Ameringen 2026
Scoping review (published and gray literature; cannabinoids and psychedelics in OCD)
Number of included studies not reported (in the abstract; the full text could not be read)
People with OCD (especially treatment-resistant OCD)
Synthetic and natural cannabinoids (the review also examines psilocybin, LSD, DMT and MDMA)There is very little cannabinoid evidence in OCD: mostly cross-sectional surveys, self-report studies and case reports, plus a few small clinical studies; there are no well-controlled, methodologically sound RCTs. According to the authors, the current evidence does not support using synthetic or natural cannabinoids to treat OCD (the signal is stronger for psilocybin in treatment-resistant OCD)
Side effects: Not reported (in the abstract)
PMID 41317726, doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.11.021, Of the 5 authors, only the first author reported financial relationships (the other 4 wrote that they had no relationships to declare). The first author reported research support from a medical cannabis research center (Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PMID 42441734
Kayser 2021 (survey)
Cross-sectional online survey (US; self-report)
1,096 completed; 601 included
Adults who use cannabis and either had an OCD diagnosis or scored above the OCD threshold on a validated scale (OCI-R) (mean age 28.6; about half women)
Cannabis products the person used on their own (mostly inhaled flower; 59.2% of flower users and 69.7% of concentrate users reported high-THC products)Not measured (observed use: 344 of 601 people used at least daily)29.1% used cannabis specifically for OCD symptoms; 33.8% had a doctor's recommendation. Most reported that cannabis improved obsessions (68.3%) and compulsions (65.4%); 17.3% reported worsening obsessions and 13.8% worsening compulsions. 42.1% met the criteria for cannabis use disorder (CUDIT-R at least 12), and 65.6% met the criteria for problematic use. Only 15.5% had ever received exposure and response prevention therapy; the more cannabis people used, the less likely they were to be receiving current OCD treatment. Self-selected sample and self-report; it describes patterns of use and risks, not evidence of an effect
Side effects: No separate side effect measurement; the use disorder finding is in the results column
PMID 34336561, doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2021.100664, PMC8323783. NIMH support
Benatti 2023
Cross-sectional study (tertiary OCD clinic, Italy; consecutive patients; a questionnaire designed for this study and clinical scales)
70
Outpatients diagnosed with OCD (Italy)
Cannabis the person used on their ownNot measured42.8% of patients had used cannabis at some point in their lives, and 14.3% were still using it. About 10% of those who had used it reported improvement in OCD symptoms and 23.3% reported worsening anxiety. Among those still using it, tobacco, alcohol and other substance use, as well as co-occurring diagnoses that began before OCD, were more common; illness severity was similar in the three groups (current users, former users, never users)
Side effects: Worsening anxiety (23.3% of users; self-reported)
PMID 36148826, doi:10.1017/S1092852922001006
Collins 2025
Cross-sectional online survey (US)
Not reported (in the abstract; the full text could not be read)
Adults with hair-pulling disorder or skin-picking disorder
Cannabis the person used on their own (use in the past year)Not measuredAbout 33% of participants had used cannabis in the past year. Those who had used it in the past year pulled their hair or picked their skin on more days per week; in hair pulling, use was also linked to greater distress from the disorder. Cross-sectional design; it is not known which leads to whichPMID 40435936, doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001832, The last author (Grant) is also the first author of Grant 2011 and Grant 2022
Kutzner 2023
Prospective cohort (Project Alliance 1, US; measurements at ages 17 and 19; cross-lagged panel model with a polygenic risk score)
547
Adolescents (multiethnic sample; 52.4% male)
Self-reported cannabis use (frequency in the past 3 months)Not measured2 years (from age 17 to age 19)Cannabis use at 17 was linked to slightly more obsessive-compulsive symptoms at 19 (standardized coefficient 0.13; p < 0.01); obsessive-compulsive symptoms at 17 did not predict later cannabis use. Those with a higher genetic predisposition to OCD used less cannabis at 17. Symptoms were self-reported and measured with different scales at the two ages; no OCD diagnosis was made. Observational; does not show cause and effect. NIH support; the authors reported no conflicts of interestPMID 36443914, doi:10.1002/jad.12125, PMC10588756

Reported side effects

  • Dronabinol 5–15 mg/day, 10 weeks: no serious side effects; non-serious side effects 16/25 vs. 7/25; lightheadedness or dizziness 5 (placebo 1), sleepiness 5 (3), feeling 'high' 4 (0), dulled attention and thinking 4 (2), dry mouth 4 (2) (Grant 2022, registry record)
  • Dronabinol 2.5–15 mg/day, 12 weeks: lightheadedness in 4 of 14 people; no clear impairment on cognitive tests (Grant 2011)
  • Smoked THC-containing cannabis, single dose: increase in heart rate and systolic blood pressure; panic symptoms that passed within 40 minutes in one participant with panic disorder; no serious side effects (Kayser 2020)
  • Nabilone 2 mg/day, 4 weeks: increased anxiety lasting 12–24 hours after the first dose in 3 people (they stopped); in week 1, dry mouth in 9, tension in 8 and sleepiness in 7 people; no serious side effects (Kayser 2020, nabilone)
  • Approved CBD 5–10 mg/kg/day: diarrhea in 1 of 4 people; no serious side effects (NCT04978428, registry record)
  • CBDA-dominant extract in children, 20 mg/kg/day, 12 weeks: nausea, diarrhea, tiredness or a delay in falling asleep in 33%; 1 serious side effect (diarrhea); no significant changes in blood tests (Keating 2026)
  • Across all RCTs in mental health conditions, the chance of any side effect was higher with cannabinoids (OR 1.75; number needed to harm 7), with no difference in serious side effects (Wilson 2026)

Monitoring done in studies

  • Screening for cannabis use disorder in people with OCD who use cannabis, and discussing access to proven OCD treatment (SSRIs, exposure and response prevention therapy) (Kayser 2021)
  • If CBD is used together with an antidepressant, a doctor monitors for the medicine's side effects (increased citalopram levels: Salcedo 2026, PMID 41622700; Anderson 2021, PMID 34121064; a case of low sodium with sertraline: Nanan 2022, PMID 36627907); details on the site's Antidepressants page
  • Ongoing trials (October 2026): no cannabinoid study recruiting patients with OCD, hair pulling or skin picking was found on ClinicalTrials.gov. A brain imaging study planned with a single dose of nabilone in 60 adults with OCD (NCT04880278) was withdrawn before any patients were enrolled because the investigator left the institution. The registry record of the PANS study (NCT06621888) has no results; the researchers write that a placebo-controlled study with the same product is being prepared (Keating 2026)

Who should be careful

  • Cannabis use disorder: 42.1% of 601 people with OCD who use cannabis met the criteria for use disorder; the more they used, the less likely they were to be receiving current OCD treatment (Kayser 2021, survey)
  • Anxiety: in OCD, smoked THC-dominant and CBD-dominant cannabis reduced momentary anxiety less than placebo did (Kayser 2020); after the first dose of nabilone, 3 people stopped because of increased anxiety (Kayser 2020, nabilone); 23.3% of cannabis users at an OCD clinic reported worsening anxiety (Benatti 2023)
  • Use alongside therapy: in the survey, about 3% of participants said they used cannabis during therapy, for example before exposure exercises; researchers discuss whether this could turn into an avoidance behavior that weakens how therapy works (Kayser 2021). Nabilone's contribution to therapy was tested in a small study without placebo and could not be separated out (Kayser 2020, nabilone)
  • Adolescents: cannabis use at age 17 was linked to slightly more obsessive-compulsive symptoms at age 19 (standardized coefficient 0.13; observational; Kutzner 2023)
  • Children: there are no controlled studies of cannabinoids in children with OCD; the only data come from an uncontrolled study in 14 children with PANS, funded by the product companies (Keating 2026)
  • Heart and blood vessels: smoked THC-containing cannabis raised heart rate and systolic blood pressure (Kayser 2020)
  • History of psychosis or bipolar disorder: the OCD studies did not include people with a personal history (in one study, also a history in a first-degree relative) of psychosis or bipolar disorder (Kayser 2020); safety in these people is not known. Not using THC-containing products without talking to a doctor is a precautionary recommendation, not a direct study result

Drug interactions

  • Detailed information and monitoring recommendations are on the 'Antidepressants' and 'Antipsychotics and lithium' pages in the site's drug interactions section
  • Citalopram and escitalopram: in 20 healthy volunteers, CBD 2.5 mg/kg twice a day for 12 days increased the total amount of a single dose of citalopram in the blood by 43% (geometric mean ratio 1.43; 90% CI 1.34–1.52) (Salcedo 2026, PMID 41622700); in 6 patients with anxiety disorders, adding CBD 200–800 mg/day significantly raised citalopram levels (Anderson 2021, PMID 34121064)
  • Sertraline and fluoxetine: in the laboratory, CBD had very little effect on their breakdown (Anderson 2021, PMID 34121064); low sodium and cognitive impairment were reported after CBD was added in a patient taking sertraline whose CYP2C19 enzyme works slowly (case report; Nanan 2022, PMID 36627907); there is also a case report of a possible interaction involving fluoxetine and CYP2D6 (Anderson 2022, PMID 35652796)
  • Fluvoxamine and clomipramine: no human studies were found that looked at them together with CBD or THC (October 2026 search)
  • Add-on antipsychotic (sometimes added to an SSRI in OCD): no study with results was found that measured blood levels with CBD; details on the site's antipsychotics page. Most of the children with PANS took the CBDA-dominant extract while using SSRIs and antipsychotics; the study did not look at interactions separately, and there were no significant changes in blood tests over 12 weeks (Keating 2026)
  • Nabilone and THC: the OCD studies mostly did not include people taking psychiatric medicines (in the laboratory study, 2 people were taking an SSRI); the safety of use together with an SSRI or clomipramine was not examined in these studies (Kayser 2020)

Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial (a study in which participants are assigned to groups by chance); placebo, an inactive substance; SMD, OR and RR, effect measures used in analyses that pool studies; CYP, liver enzymes that break down medicines.

If you are considering CBD

  • The first-line treatments for OCD are medicines from the SSRI group and exposure and response prevention therapy; behavioral therapies are also used for hair pulling and skin picking. You can talk about these options with your psychiatrist or psychologist; CBD has not been shown to replace them.
  • Do not stop your medicine or change its dose on your own. If you take an antidepressant, especially citalopram, escitalopram or sertraline, talk about CBD with your doctor and pharmacist.
  • If you use cannabis, it can help to talk openly with your doctor about how often you use it; use disorder was common among people with OCD who use cannabis, and cannabis can make progress in therapy harder.
  • THC-containing products can increase anxiety. Check the product's label and its independent certificate of analysis (COA) to find out whether it contains THC.
  • If you are thinking about it for your child, first talk with the child psychiatrist who follows them; there are no controlled studies in children.
  • If you have a history of psychosis or bipolar disorder, or if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, tell your doctor; the studies did not include these people, and safety in these situations is not known.

Choose your age group, medicines and situation to prepare a short summary you can take to your doctor. Nothing you enter is sent anywhere.

Open the personal warnings toolConvert drops ↔ mg

Bottom line

CBD oil has not yet been studied enough in OCD and hair pulling; the only data come from an uncontrolled study that 4 people started. In two small controlled studies with THC-containing products, no clear benefit was seen compared with a dummy treatment (very weak evidence), and use disorder is common among people with OCD who use cannabis. OCD has well-established treatments, and behavioral therapies are used for hair pulling too; talking with a specialist is a good place to start.

Frequently asked questions

Does CBD oil work for OCD?

There is not yet enough research to know. Pure CBD or CBD oil has never been compared with placebo in OCD. Four people started the only study with the approved CBD medicine, 2 completed it, and there was no comparison group; the results are only in the registry record. In 12 people with OCD, CBD-dominant cannabis smoked once did not affect obsessions and compulsions differently from placebo. So the evidence for CBD is insufficient.

Does cannabis reduce obsessions and compulsions?

In surveys, most people with OCD who use cannabis say their obsessions and compulsions decreased; but in the same survey about one in six reported worsening, and 42% met the criteria for cannabis use disorder. In the placebo-controlled laboratory study, where people did not know what they were smoking, THC-dominant or CBD-dominant cannabis did not affect obsessions and compulsions differently from inactive cannabis, and it reduced anxiety less. In data that users logged in an app, the effect also faded over time. The evidence for THC-containing products is very weak.

Does cannabis or THC work for hair pulling or skin picking?

The best study so far does not point that way. In a study with 50 adults who pulled their hair or picked their skin, in which participants were assigned to groups at random, the THC medicine dronabinol did no better than a dummy treatment over 10 weeks; symptoms decreased in both groups. The positive result of the earlier 14-person uncontrolled study was not confirmed in this study. There is no study with results using CBD oil for hair pulling or skin picking. The evidence for THC-containing products is very weak.

Do CBD or cannabis boost the effect of therapy?

So far this is only an idea; the evidence is very weak. In an 11-person pilot study with the THC-like medicine nabilone, OCD scores dropped clearly when exposure and response prevention therapy was added to nabilone; but because the study had no group taking a dummy treatment or receiving therapy alone, it is not known whether the improvement came from nabilone or from the therapy. The survey found that some people used cannabis before therapy; researchers also discuss whether this might weaken therapy. If you are in therapy, it is a good idea to talk about your cannabis use with your therapist.

Does CBD interact with my OCD medicines?

It may. CBD slows the breakdown of some medicines in the body. In healthy volunteers, CBD increased the total amount of citalopram in the blood by 43%; citalopram levels also rose in patients who added CBD. In a patient taking sertraline, low sodium and difficulty thinking were reported after CBD was added. In the laboratory, CBD had very little effect on the breakdown of fluoxetine and sertraline. No human studies were found with fluvoxamine or clomipramine. If you use CBD, tell your doctor and pharmacist; details are on the site's Antidepressants page.

Can a cannabis product be used for my child's sudden-onset obsessions (PANS)?

There is only one preliminary study on this: 14 children with PANS used an extract made up mainly of the acid form of CBD (CBDA) and containing a little THC for 12 weeks, and their symptoms improved; but there was no comparison group, the children continued their other medicines, and the study was funded by the companies developing the product. There are no controlled studies in children, and long-term safety is not known. The decision should be made together with the child psychiatrist or child neurologist who follows your child.

Is there an FDA-approved CBD medicine for OCD or hair pulling?

No. As of November 2, 2026, the only FDA-approved CBD medicine is Epidiolex, a prescription oral solution for seizures linked to Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome and tuberous sclerosis complex in people 1 year and older. Doctors can legally prescribe an approved drug for another use when they judge it medically appropriate (this is called “off-label” use), but Epidiolex hasn’t been approved for OCD or hair pulling. CBD oils sold in stores and online aren’t FDA-approved. The FDA hasn’t evaluated them for safety, dose or quality, and when it tested some products, many didn’t contain the amount of CBD the label claimed. If you’re thinking about CBD, talk with your doctor or pharmacist first, especially about the medicines you already take.

References

Show 12 references
  1. Grant 2022. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group RCT (single center, University of Chicago; according to the registry record, participants, investigators and raters were blinded). PMID 34825898, doi:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000382, NCT03530800, October 2018–November 2021, results entered in the registry record on June 2, 2022: participant flow, baseline characteristics and side effect table). The full text is not open access, funding and the declaration of interests could not be read
  2. Kayser 2020 (laboratory). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover (within-subject) laboratory study; three sessions, a single dose in each (New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University). PMID 32383271, doi:10.1002/da.23032, NCT03274440, results in the registry record). PMC7423713
  3. Kayser 2020 (nabilone and exposure therapy). Randomized, open-label pilot study; no placebo group (both groups took nabilone, one also received therapy); independent raters were blind to the study design. Published in the journal as a letter to the editor. PMID 32068563, doi:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001179, NCT02911324, results in the registry record, Y-BOCS change the same as in the article). PMC7206660
  4. NCT04978428 (approved CBD, OCD and related disorders; registry results). Phase 2, open-label, single-group pilot study (University of Chicago). Results only on ClinicalTrials.gov; no peer-reviewed publication. NCT04978428, results entered in the registry record on July 29, 2026), no peer-reviewed publication found in PubMed (October 30, 2026)
  5. Grant 2011. Prospective, open-label, single-group pilot study (US). PMID 21590520, doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2347-8, NCT01093976, only 14 women with hair pulling alone were enrolled, final MGH-HPS score 8.71, SD 5.48). NIH support
  6. Keating 2026 (NTI164, PANS). Phase 1/2, open-label, single-group study (Australia, two children's hospitals); funded by the product companies (registry sponsor Fenix Innovation Group, collaborator Neurotech International); 2 of the 15 authors reported company ties: the last author received financial support from both companies, and the first author started working at the sponsor company after the study ended (the other 13 authors reported no conflicts of interest); according to the article, the sponsors had no role in data collection or analysis. PMID 41513541, doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00828, NCT06621888, 18 people in the registry record, June 2023–December 2025, no results entered). PMC12976522. The autism study of the same product is in the site's autism table (Keating 2026, NTI164, Harmony)
  7. Wilson 2026. Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs (1980–May 13, 2025; PROSPERO CRD42023392718; GRADE). PMID 41856154, doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(26)00015-5, Correction: Lancet Psychiatry 2026, PMID 42302809, June 16, 2026: the axis of a figure and the study counts in the table were corrected, results unchanged). The same review is also in the site's anxiety, psychosis, depression, bipolar, sleep, substance use, autism, Tourette syndrome, appetite loss and ADHD tables
  8. Van Ameringen 2026. Scoping review (published and gray literature; cannabinoids and psychedelics in OCD). PMID 41317726, doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.11.021, Of the 5 authors, only the first author reported financial relationships (the other 4 wrote that they had no relationships to declare). The first author reported research support from a medical cannabis research center (Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, PMID 42441734
  9. Kayser 2021 (survey). Cross-sectional online survey (US; self-report). PMID 34336561, doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2021.100664, PMC8323783. NIMH support
  10. Benatti 2023. Cross-sectional study (tertiary OCD clinic, Italy; consecutive patients; a questionnaire designed for this study and clinical scales). PMID 36148826, doi:10.1017/S1092852922001006
  11. Collins 2025. Cross-sectional online survey (US). PMID 40435936, doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001832, The last author (Grant) is also the first author of Grant 2011 and Grant 2022
  12. Kutzner 2023. Prospective cohort (Project Alliance 1, US; measurements at ages 17 and 19; cross-lagged panel model with a polygenic risk score). PMID 36443914, doi:10.1002/jad.12125, PMC10588756
Points that could not be verified from the full text
  • The full text of the controlled study in hair pulling and skin picking (Grant 2022) is not open access: group means, confidence intervals, funding and the declaration of interests could not be read; side effects and participant flow were taken from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry record (NCT03530800). The registry record has only the baseline scores of the hair-pulling and skin-picking scales.
  • The full text of the uncontrolled study in hair pulling (Grant 2011) could not be read: the dose titration schedule is not in the abstract; in the article, 12 of 14 people completed it, while in the registry record all 14 appear to have completed it.
  • In the 4-person study with the approved CBD medicine (NCT04978428), the participants' diagnoses, the direction of the Y-BOCS change and the actual length of the study (the registry record says 2 weeks, while the dose schedule describes 3 weeks) could not be verified from the registry record; no peer-reviewed publication was found.
  • In the PANS study (Keating 2026), the OCD scale score at week 12 is in a supplementary table and could not be read; the article says 14 children and the registry record says 18 people, and the reason for the difference is not explained.
  • Van Ameringen 2026, Wilson 2026, Benatti 2023 and Collins 2025 were read only from the abstract (the correction to Wilson 2026 published in the journal was read: only the axis of one figure and the study counts in a table were corrected, and the results did not change); the number of participants in Collins 2025 is not in the abstract. What the 2025 international OCD guideline (CANMAT/ICOCS, PMID 42441734) recommends about cannabinoids could not be read because the full text is not openly available.
  • The full text of the 2021 Cochrane review of medicine treatments for hair pulling (PMID 34582562) could not be downloaded; the registration number of the dronabinol trial appears in the review's list of registered trials, but the section in which it is mentioned could not be verified.

Research history

Here we record what changed on this page, when and why, with dates. The newest change is at the top.

  1. In the Kayser 2020 laboratory study row, it was corrected that the placebo cigarette contained no THC: only the two active cannabis types contained THC (PMID 32383271, full text). The conclusion and the evidence level did not change.

  2. Page published. This first assessment reviewed 12 studies.

Evidence changes across all topics